Fun with Sunday Politics Shows
Just finished watching Meet The Press. You know what? I bet Republicans and Democrats could probably agree -- Hillary Clinton would be a better candidate for President. Republicans would say yes, becuase they'd figure they'd trash her, and Democrats would be happy becuase she seems to be able to articulate. Right now we have John Kerry, a guy who takes 30 minutes to give a one word answer and then George Bush, who doesn't even remember the question 3 seconds after it was asked. I don't agree with all of Hillary's positions, but you have to say, at least she made a case for it and wasn't wishy washy.
In other news, as I type this I'm listening to my Ipod through my Altec Lansing InMotion speakers. You won't mistake it for a Bose waveradio, but still it's pretty awesome for such a small package. I was wondering why the price had dropped over $50 on this unit in the past month -- it turns out Altec has made newer speakers now with a remote control. Nice idea, but aside from pause and volume, I think it might be tough to see what song you'll be playing from across the room.
I see that Madden 2005 for the PC has been pushed back. No idea why, or what the deal is. I hope the graphics will look good on a GeForce 6800.
.
I just did my GameFly GameQ update as I often do on Sunday mornings (I go through the paper, look at all the game releases and Netflix DVD movie releases and add them to my queue). The big new releases show up in September - December. In my queue alone, there are 10 games that are releasing between 9/1 and 9/10. That will keep some people busy!

August 29th, 2004 - 12:57
One of the big reasons Hillary could never be president is simply because she stayed with her husband who publicly cheated on her. Do you think if a man that was running for president who stayed with his cheating wife wouldnt be looked down upon for being weak? It looks really bad. Its like saying, I’m Hillary Clinton, walk all over me, I’ll forgive you.
August 29th, 2004 - 14:34
In this day and age, I seriously doubt that stuff matters. I’m sure that Republicans would play that angle as if it has something to do with running the country in the same way oral sex does — ie NOTHING.
August 29th, 2004 - 17:21
Ha Ha.
“Oral sex has nothing to do with running the country”
Way to miss the obvious. How about blatantly lying about it? How about having NO character whatsoever? Does that have anything to do with running the country? Should our leader be a womanizer, cheat on his wife, get caught, and then lie repeatedly about it? Guess moral clarity and a backbone isn’t required to run the country either.
You libs and your Clinton adoration are really quite sickening.
August 30th, 2004 - 09:50
This still pisses me off.
There was no reason to ask Clinton under oath if had an affair. The reason it was done was that they already knew he did, and wanted to charge him with perjury. The fact that he did had no bearing on anything to do with any of his legal problems, on which he was never even charged with anything.
So it’s time to play hardball and get some answers under oath from our idiot president. Did he do cocaine? Where was he when he was supposed to be in the Air National Guard? How often did he drink once he quit, and became born again? Does he watch porn?
Those are just the questions that really do not matter, but go to his “integrity”. Of course he has been lying to us about an action that has killed not only thousands upon thousands of civiliams in Iraq, but put our own tropps in the line of fire. Those lies are costing us billions of dollars.
But Clinton got a blow job, then tried to hide it from his wife. Impeach him for that?