<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fun with Sunday Politics Shows</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/</link>
	<description>Two guys who love Sports Gaming on their PCs and consoles rant and rave about various stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 13:32:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jayhawker</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-383</link>
		<dc:creator>Jayhawker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2004 14:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-383</guid>
		<description>This still pisses me off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There was no reason to ask Clinton under oath if had an affair.  The reason it was done was that they already knew he did, and wanted to charge him with perjury.  The fact that he did had no bearing on anything to do with any of his legal problems, on which he was never even charged with anything.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So it's time to play hardball and get some answers under oath from our idiot president.  Did he do cocaine?  Where was he when he was supposed to be in the Air National Guard?  How often did he drink once he quit, and became born again?  Does he watch porn?  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those are just the questions that really do not matter, but go to his "integrity".  Of course he has been lying to us about an action that has killed not only thousands upon thousands of civiliams in Iraq, but put our own tropps in the line of fire.  Those lies are costing us billions of dollars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Clinton got a blow job, then tried to hide it from his wife.    Impeach him for that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This still pisses me off.</p>
<p>There was no reason to ask Clinton under oath if had an affair.  The reason it was done was that they already knew he did, and wanted to charge him with perjury.  The fact that he did had no bearing on anything to do with any of his legal problems, on which he was never even charged with anything.</p>
<p>So it&#8217;s time to play hardball and get some answers under oath from our idiot president.  Did he do cocaine?  Where was he when he was supposed to be in the Air National Guard?  How often did he drink once he quit, and became born again?  Does he watch porn?  </p>
<p>Those are just the questions that really do not matter, but go to his &#8220;integrity&#8221;.  Of course he has been lying to us about an action that has killed not only thousands upon thousands of civiliams in Iraq, but put our own tropps in the line of fire.  Those lies are costing us billions of dollars.</p>
<p>But Clinton got a blow job, then tried to hide it from his wife.    Impeach him for that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-373</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 22:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-373</guid>
		<description>Ha Ha.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Oral sex has nothing to do with running the country"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Way to miss the obvious.  How about blatantly lying about it? How about having NO character whatsoever?  Does that have anything to do with running the country?  Should our leader be a womanizer, cheat on his wife, get caught, and then lie repeatedly about it?  Guess moral clarity and a backbone isn't required to run the country either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;You libs and your Clinton adoration are really quite sickening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha Ha.</p>
<p>&#8220;Oral sex has nothing to do with running the country&#8221;</p>
<p>Way to miss the obvious.  How about blatantly lying about it? How about having NO character whatsoever?  Does that have anything to do with running the country?  Should our leader be a womanizer, cheat on his wife, get caught, and then lie repeatedly about it?  Guess moral clarity and a backbone isn&#8217;t required to run the country either.</p>
<p>You libs and your Clinton adoration are really quite sickening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Clarke</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-369</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-369</guid>
		<description>In this day and age, I seriously doubt that stuff matters. I'm sure that Republicans would play that angle as if it has something to do with running the country in the same way oral sex does -- ie NOTHING.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In this day and age, I seriously doubt that stuff matters. I&#8217;m sure that Republicans would play that angle as if it has something to do with running the country in the same way oral sex does &#8212; ie NOTHING.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-366</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Aug 2004 17:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2004/08/29/fun-with-sunday-politics-shows/#comment-366</guid>
		<description>One of the big reasons Hillary could never be president is simply because she stayed with her husband who publicly cheated on her.  Do you think if a man that was running for president who stayed with his cheating wife wouldnt be looked down upon for being weak?  It looks really bad.  Its like saying, I'm Hillary Clinton, walk all over me, I'll forgive you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the big reasons Hillary could never be president is simply because she stayed with her husband who publicly cheated on her.  Do you think if a man that was running for president who stayed with his cheating wife wouldnt be looked down upon for being weak?  It looks really bad.  Its like saying, I&#8217;m Hillary Clinton, walk all over me, I&#8217;ll forgive you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
