<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Football on GameShark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2007/08/28/more-football-on-gameshark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2007/08/28/more-football-on-gameshark/</link>
	<description>Two guys who love Sports Gaming on their PCs and consoles rant and rave about various stuff.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:55:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2007/08/28/more-football-on-gameshark/#comment-5594</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Aug 2007 13:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sportsgamerblog.com/2007/08/28/more-football-on-gameshark/#comment-5594</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the plug, and yep, I agree on the different perspectives being a boon to GameShark as we both justify the reasons for the different grades. In my case I've never felt like Madden's franchise stuff works very well anyway and graded almost purely for on-field action, which I thought was as much fun as I've had with a football game in a long, long time. (Even with some game balance blemishes.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the plug, and yep, I agree on the different perspectives being a boon to GameShark as we both justify the reasons for the different grades. In my case I&#8217;ve never felt like Madden&#8217;s franchise stuff works very well anyway and graded almost purely for on-field action, which I thought was as much fun as I&#8217;ve had with a football game in a long, long time. (Even with some game balance blemishes.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
